ChatGPT creator OpenAI has been made an offer it can't refuse, otherwise known as a highly valued round of investments, but to get all of it, OpenAI needs to shift away from its original non-profit approach.
Shared on the , the latest round of funding totals plans to invest $40 billion into the company, for a company valuation of $300 billion. The blog post states this "enables us to push the frontiers of AI research even further" and finishes off by bragging that ChatGPT is used by 500 million people every week.
As noted by , the investment from Softbank will fall to $20 billion—$10 billion below the expected $30 billion—should OpenAI still operate as a non-profit by the end of 2025. The question of whether or not OpenAI will remain non-profit has been hotly debated over the last few months. X owner, and alleged , Elon Musk vowed to bow out of a in February if it agrees to stay non-profit. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman offered to in retaliation.
This rather blatantly rows back on the original OpenAI organization mission statement. Back in 2015, it said:
"OpenAI is a non-profit artificial intelligence research company. Our goal is to advance digital intelligence in yono all app the way that is most likely to benefit humanity as a whole, unconstrained by a need to generate financial return. Since our research is free from financial obligations, we can better focus on a positive w69 slot human impact."
The switch to for-profit , which could in return result in even more investments. These investments would then need to generate revenue for board members which would change financial incentives for OpenAI as a whole. For-profit companies need to serve shareholders above all else, whereas non-profit organizations don't have the same incentives.
The plus side to this is more money in the OpenAI could result in new ventures and more research funding. Whether or not the end user will benefit from this structure change is anyone's guess but there's some rightful scepticism about it, especially when you consider generative AI's , and
The argued in favour of this restructuring last year, saying "We once again need to raise more capital than we’d imagined. Investors want to back us but, at this scale of capital, need conventional equity and less structural bespokeness."